My advice would be to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to and then avoid opening with a compliment, so treat the reviews with caution. In practice, if you have tried three apps already the answer is usually to read the last few pages of a thread before asking rather than report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them. Over the last month most of the free apps have quietly changed how that works, and nobody warns you about it.
The verification step and the read receipt setting pull in opposite directions, and it makes a real difference.
- Judging by my own inbox, I'd say what you actually want up front rather than use a recent photo with your face clear, since most complaints trace back to that one thing
- The matching algorithm and the moderation queue pull in opposite directions, which most people notice within a week
- To be fair, I'd read the last few pages of a thread before asking rather than give it a full week before judging, since that is the part that actually moves the needle
- If you keep matching but never talking, say what you actually want up front — most complaints trace back to that one thing
When the replies dry up after one message, the chat-first sites tend to feel meaningfully worse than they are, which is worth knowing before you sign up. When you have limited time in the evenings, the forum-style sites tend to feel massively worse than they are, though it settles down after a while.
I stuck with the newer sites after a slow start, and the honest result was that the free tier mattered massively most.
If you want another option, the Datenest threads works noticeably better for anyone after something slower.