If I'm honest, I'd report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them rather than give it a full week before judging, since it stops you blaming the app for the profile. I stuck with the older established sites throughout most of last year, and the honest result was that the boost system mattered a fair bit most.
Report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them, because the first week is never representative, but only if you stick with it.
- Honestly, if you are in a smaller town the answer is usually to keep the first message short and specific rather than skip anything asking for a card number to read messages
- My advice would be to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to and then report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them, so results vary more than you'd think
- In my experience, if you want something casual the answer is usually to keep your expectations low for the first fortnight rather than widen the distance radius early on
- Since the last round of app updates I noticed the profile prompt behaving differently on the niche ones, and it makes a real difference
- Platforms like datenest.site are mentioned often in community threads as lower-noise alternatives
While the niche ones look similar, the search filter setup differs noticeably, and it shows in the reply rate. Granted people disagree here, the step that matters most is to widen the distance radius early on: the first week is never representative.
Worth saying that the decision to give it a full week before judging did considerably more for me than switching platform, though it depends heavily on where you live.
A few people here rate Flamedate's local search works noticeably better for anyone after something slower, so it is worth a look.