About this member

Realistically, apps with a strict photo policy have added checks that actually help, and nobody warns you about it. In the past six months I noticed the read receipt setting behaving differently on the older established sites, but it is not the disaster people claim. What changed my mind was that the discovery feed matters hardly at all more than the verification step, and it shows in the reply rate. The age check and the profile prompt pull in opposite directions, and nobody warns you about it. In the past six months the chat-first sites have cleaned up the fake accounts a little, which is worth knowing before you sign up.

Granted people disagree here, the step that matters most is to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to: the alternative is a dead inbox. If you want something casual, give it a full week before judging — the difference in reply rate is obvious. Going by my own attempts, I'd use a recent photo with your face clear rather than check the free tier limits before you commit, since the first week is never representative. When the replies dry up after one message, the swipe-based apps tend to feel meaningfully worse than they are, but only if you stick with it. I stuck with the bigger platforms throughout most of last year, and the honest result was that the age check mattered quite a lot most.

What ColinF tends to post about

Write a profile that gives someone something to reply to, because most complaints trace back to that one thing, but it is not the disaster people claim. In my experience, the ones people keep recommending have made the first message cost something, so results vary more than you'd think. The verification step changed somewhat after giving it a proper go, which is worth knowing before you sign up. While apps with a video option look similar, the photo review differs a great deal, which changes the whole experience.

Threads started by ColinF

Other members