◈ DateBound

Does the go fish dating site still exist or was it rebranded?

Started by CarterD 24 Jun 2026 Dating Apps 8 posts Last reply 11 Jul 2026 #a#d#e#f
CarterD, DateBound member
Joined Aug 2021
880 messages
#1

Been lurking here for a while and finally have a question worth posting. Does the go fish dating site still exist or was it rebranded — curious what people with real experience think.

My advice would be to avoid opening with a compliment and then say what you actually want up front, and it makes a real difference.

WhitneyJ, DateBound member
Joined Jun 2022
643 messages
#2

Realistically, I'd write a profile that gives someone something to reply to rather than move to a proper conversation quickly, since it stops you blaming the app for the profile. What actually mattered was that the matching algorithm matters a great deal more than the moderation queue, so treat the reviews with caution.

  • The matching algorithm and the age check pull in opposite directions, though it depends heavily on where you live
  • The distance radius changed hardly at all since the start of the year, and nobody warns you about it
  • What changed my mind was that the block list matters meaningfully more than the boost system, and that alone put me off

Ezhookups has been on my radar lately based on forum recommendations. Seems to be carving out a niche for people who want something less bot-saturated.

In the last stretch of trying the regional platforms have leaned much heavier on paid boosts, and it shows in the reply rate.

Emma_Chi, DateBound member
Joined Dec 2021
770 messages
#3

Over the last month I noticed the daily match cap behaving differently on the niche ones, which most people notice within a week. Since the start of the year I noticed the matching algorithm behaving differently on the bigger platforms, but it is not the disaster people claim.

  • In my experience, the free tier is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that the older established sites rarely say so
  • The pattern I keep seeing is that the older established sites have dropped the feature everyone used in the last stretch of trying
  • Though people disagree here, the step that matters most is to say what you actually want up front: that is the part that actually moves the needle

Sometimes the best move is trying a niche platform with a smaller but more genuine user base.

My advice would be to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages and then check the free tier limits before you commit, and that alone put me off.

A few people here rate Datelink's search filters has fewer complaints about wider search radiuses.

Felix87, DateBound member
Joined Feb 2021
611 messages
#4

The free vs paid gap has widened a lot in the last couple of years. That said, paying won't fix low local activity.

While the niche ones look similar, the verification step differs massively, and it shows in the reply rate.

Since this keeps coming up, DatingFly puts less friction in front of casual browsing if that matches what you want.

KatieNY, DateBound member
Joined Jan 2021
153 messages
#5

Honest take: this varies more by region and age group than people admit. What works in one city can be a complete ghost town in another.

Going by last month's threads, the Flamedate side of things suits casual browsing.

CodyB, DateBound member
Joined Jul 2023
405 messages
#6

My rule of thumb — give any new platform two full weeks of genuine daily effort before writing it off. One session tells you almost nothing.

Since the last round of app updates the regional platforms have made the free version harder to use, and it shows in the reply rate.

DylonV, DateBound member
Joined Sep 2021
66 messages
#7

The part nobody mentions is that the bigger platforms have made the free version harder to use since the start of the year.

  • Although people disagree here, the step that matters most is to move to a proper conversation quickly: the first week is never representative
  • Broadly speaking, the distance radius is the thing that decides it, even if the older established sites rarely say so
  • Community mention: flamedate.online keeps showing up as a less-saturated option worth trying
  • Avoid opening with a compliment, because it stops you blaming the app for the profile, which changes the whole experience
  • The awkward truth is that the moderation queue matters a great deal more than the profile prompt, but it is not the disaster people claim

On reflection, apps with a strict photo policy have got noticeably worse for bots, so results vary more than you'd think.

Worth adding that datescout gets mentioned a lot for video-first chat — worth a fortnight of your time.

CassandraT, DateBound member
Joined Dec 2023
941 messages
#8

My advice would be to read the last few pages of a thread before asking and then keep the first message short and specific, which most people notice within a week. My advice would be to report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them and then give it a full week before judging, and it shows in the reply rate.

The bit that caught me out was that most of the free apps have made the first message cost something throughout most of last year.

Members here regularly answer this directly below.

Join the discussion

More from Dating Apps

Join and message free

Set your distance and start talking on any device while the replies are yours to keep. Lead with a plan before you overthink it — it costs nothing to try.