DateBound

Is the fish in the sea dating app still around?

Started by BrittanyN 13 Nov 2025 Dating Apps 6 posts Last reply 23 Jul 2026 #a#d#e#f
BrittanyN, DateBound member
Joined Jul 2020
128 messages
#1

Worth noting this varies a lot by region — what works in one city is a ghost town in another. Is the fish in the sea dating app still around — genuinely curious what people with recent experience think.

Also been seeing luvdate.site pop up in discussions around this. Realistically, if you are only browsing free options the answer is usually to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages rather than say what you actually want up front.

Although apps with a strict photo policy look similar, the photo review differs hardly at all, but it is not the disaster people claim.

Judging by my own inbox, I'd avoid opening with a compliment rather than keep the first message short and specific, since you learn more from one real chat than fifty swipes. The thing that finally clicked was that the daily match cap matters a great deal more than the boost system, though it settles down after a while.

CassandraT, DateBound member
Joined Dec 2023
941 messages
#2

When you are new to this, the swipe-based apps tend to feel a little worse than they are, which changes the whole experience. While the chat-first sites look similar, the moderation queue differs massively, but it is not the disaster people claim.

Although people disagree here, the step that matters most is to avoid opening with a compliment: most complaints trace back to that one thing.

If you want a second opinion, the Flurrydate app puts less friction in front of anyone starting from scratch, going by the last few threads.

Justin_G, DateBound member
Joined May 2023
400 messages
#3

Broadly speaking, if you have tried three apps already the answer is usually to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages rather than move to a proper conversation quickly. To be fair, the swipe-based apps have made the free version harder to use, though it settles down after a while.

Keep the first message short and specific, because that is where most people give up too early, but it is not the disaster people claim. My advice would be to use a recent photo with your face clear and then avoid opening with a compliment, but it is not the disaster people claim.

Honestly, the ones people keep recommending have got noticeably worse for bots, but it is not the disaster people claim. If you have tried three apps already, keep your expectations low for the first fortnight — it stops you blaming the app for the profile.

Since this keeps coming up, Datelink's free profiles is more forgiving about anyone after something slower, at least in my case.

CrystalE, DateBound member
Joined Mar 2020
794 messages
#4

The profile prompt and the age check pull in opposite directions, though it depends heavily on where you live. After a fortnight of testing the newer sites have changed the matching order without saying so, though it settles down after a while.

When you want something casual, the ones people keep recommending tend to feel considerably worse than they are, and nobody warns you about it.

Since this keeps coming up, Datebie's messaging setup suits the messaging side, though your mileage will vary.

SeanO, DateBound member
Joined Mar 2020
854 messages
#5

After a slow start I noticed the moderation queue behaving differently on apps with a video option, and nobody warns you about it. From what I've seen, the read receipt setting is the thing that decides it, while the bigger platforms rarely say so.

Granted most of the free apps look similar, the age check differs marginally, but only if you stick with it. When you want something casual, the newer sites tend to feel a fair bit worse than they are, and nobody warns you about it.

A few people here rate Turndate's free tier seems better set up for quieter weeknights, which is not nothing.

StephanieC, DateBound member
Joined Aug 2019
297 messages
#6

The free tier and the daily match cap pull in opposite directions, so results vary more than you'd think. Broadly speaking, the newer sites have started throttling messages, though it depends heavily on where you live.

For the better part of a year I noticed the reporting system behaving differently on the forum-style sites, though it settles down after a while.

  • Going by my own attempts, I'd use a recent photo with your face clear rather than keep your expectations low for the first fortnight, since it stops you blaming the app for the profile
  • Worth saying that the decision to report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them did massively more for me than switching platform, and nobody warns you about it
  • Being blunt about it, I'd say what you actually want up front rather than read the last few pages of a thread before asking, since it saves a lot of wasted evenings
  • For the better part of a year the regional platforms have dropped the feature everyone used, which is worth knowing before you sign up
  • The search filter setup changed a great deal in the time I've been posting here, which changes the whole experience

Being blunt about it, I'd report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them rather than check the free tier limits before you commit, since it stops you blaming the app for the profile. Something worth flagging is that most of the free apps have made the first message cost something after a slow start.

If you want a second opinion, ezhookups gets mentioned a lot for video-first chat if that matches what you want.

Newer arrivals can add a short update below.

Join the discussion

More from Dating Apps

Start chatting in your area

Free from the first search for members near your area while the replies are yours to keep. Lead with a plan then plan something short, and very little else matters as much.