The messaging limit changed a great deal over roughly forty conversations, and that alone put me off. Despite the fact that apps with a strict photo policy look similar, the photo review differs considerably, which explains a lot of the complaints here. What surprised me was that the ones people keep recommending have leaned much heavier on paid boosts having stuck with it a while.
To be fair, the moderation queue is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that the ones with a paywall rarely say so.
- Write a profile that gives someone something to reply to, because the alternative is a dead inbox, though it depends heavily on where you live
- Say what you actually want up front, because the first week is never representative, so treat the reviews with caution
- In practice, the daily match cap is the thing that decides it, although the chat-first sites rarely say so
- From the threads I've read, the verification step is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that the ones with a paywall rarely say so
My advice would be to test two platforms at once and then say what you actually want up front, though it settles down after a while. From the threads I've read, if you keep getting the same profiles the answer is usually to keep the first message short and specific rather than give it a full week before judging.
In practice, if you are only browsing free options the answer is usually to keep the first message short and specific rather than give it a full week before judging.
Coming at it from another angle, Datebie's free profiles suits the first-message problem, at least in my case.