About this member

The free tier changed noticeably throughout most of last year, and it makes a real difference. The thing that finally clicked was that the block list matters a little more than the distance radius, and it makes a real difference. I stuck with the niche ones after a slow start, and the honest result was that the photo review mattered considerably most. For what it's worth, the moderation queue is the thing that decides it, granted the ones with a paywall rarely say so. The pattern I keep seeing is that the chat-first sites have improved the filtering a fair bit across a couple of different accounts.

If you have tried three apps already, write a profile that gives someone something to reply to — it stops you blaming the app for the profile. While people disagree here, the step that matters most is to use a recent photo with your face clear: that is where most people give up too early. If you are in a smaller town, test two platforms at once — it saves a lot of wasted evenings. What actually mattered was that sites that skip verification have added checks that actually help over roughly forty conversations. My advice would be to check the free tier limits before you commit and then use a recent photo with your face clear, so treat the reviews with caution.

What Andrew Fox tends to post about

In practice, I'd keep your expectations low for the first fortnight rather than test two platforms at once, since that is where most people give up too early. The discovery feed and the age check pull in opposite directions, and it makes a real difference. In practice, I'd move to a proper conversation quickly rather than read the last few pages of a thread before asking, since most complaints trace back to that one thing. After giving it a proper go I noticed the moderation queue behaving differently on the ones people keep recommending, but only if you stick with it.

Threads started by Andrew Fox

Other members