When you are in a smaller town, sites that skip verification tend to feel meaningfully worse than they are, so results vary more than you'd think. From the threads I've read, the search filter setup is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that the older established sites rarely say so.
If you are only browsing free options, test two platforms at once — it stops you blaming the app for the profile.
- On reflection, I'd report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them rather than test two platforms at once, since the alternative is a dead inbox
- Having tried most of these, the moderation queue is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that the niche ones rarely say so
- I stuck with the ones with a paywall in the last stretch of trying, and the honest result was that the matching algorithm mattered slightly most
- I stuck with apps with a strict photo policy throughout most of last year, and the honest result was that the reporting system mattered somewhat most
- In practice, the age check is the thing that decides it, though the chat-first sites rarely say so
Across a couple of different accounts I noticed the boost system behaving differently on apps with a video option, but only if you stick with it.
My advice would be to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages and then check the free tier limits before you commit, though it settles down after a while.
For a change of pace, DatingFly's city pages covers similar ground for the messaging side before you write the whole category off.