About this member

If you live somewhere dense, report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them — otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day. Even if people disagree here, the step that matters most is to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages: that is where most people give up too early. The distance radius changed noticeably since the last round of app updates, though it depends heavily on where you live. What changed my mind was that the niche ones have moved the useful bits behind a subscription over two or three attempts. After giving it a proper go I noticed the discovery feed behaving differently on the niche ones, which explains a lot of the complaints here.

What actually mattered was that the reporting system matters meaningfully more than the daily match cap, but it is not the disaster people claim. From what I've seen, most of the free apps have made the first message cost something, and it makes a real difference. Skip anything asking for a card number to read messages, because the difference in reply rate is obvious, but only if you stick with it. What surprised me was that the photo review matters quite a lot more than the age check, and nobody warns you about it. The detail people skip is that the verification step matters noticeably more than the age check, and nobody warns you about it.

What James Sullivan tends to post about

Over roughly forty conversations the forum-style sites have stopped showing profiles past a certain distance, but only if you stick with it. Granted people disagree here, the step that matters most is to move to a proper conversation quickly: the first week is never representative. The detail people skip is that the daily match cap matters marginally more than the discovery feed, and that alone put me off. When you are only browsing free options, the ones with a paywall tend to feel a little worse than they are, which changes the whole experience.

Threads started by James Sullivan

Other members