About this member

Keep the first message short and specific, because most complaints trace back to that one thing, and it shows in the reply rate. Across a couple of different accounts the older established sites have added checks that actually help, though it depends heavily on where you live. On reflection, if you are in a smaller town the answer is usually to check the free tier limits before you commit rather than widen the distance radius early on. Even if people disagree here, the step that matters most is to report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them: the alternative is a dead inbox. Something worth flagging is that the ones people keep recommending have started throttling messages over roughly forty conversations.

The photo review changed marginally over the last month, and nobody warns you about it. If the replies dry up after one message, widen the distance radius early on — otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day. Speaking personally, the forum-style sites have made the first message cost something, though it depends heavily on where you live. Something worth flagging is that the chat-first sites have made the first message cost something over roughly forty conversations. My advice would be to give it a full week before judging and then report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them, though it depends heavily on where you live.

What Samuel Ward tends to post about

The boost system and the matching algorithm pull in opposite directions, but it is not the disaster people claim. My advice would be to keep the first message short and specific and then give it a full week before judging, and it makes a real difference. I stuck with the swipe-based apps in the last stretch of trying, and the honest result was that the boost system mattered marginally most. From what I've seen, the boost system is the thing that decides it, granted the niche ones rarely say so.

Threads started by Samuel Ward

Other members