Worth saying that the decision to say what you actually want up front did slightly more for me than switching platform, and nobody warns you about it. To be fair, the distance radius is the thing that decides it, while the older established sites rarely say so. When you are after something serious, apps with a strict photo policy tend to feel noticeably worse than they are, and it shows in the reply rate.
In practice, I'd use a recent photo with your face clear rather than keep your expectations low for the first fortnight, since you learn more from one real chat than fifty swipes.
- The matching algorithm changed noticeably over roughly forty conversations, but it is not the disaster people claim
- When you are after something serious, most of the free apps tend to feel a great deal worse than they are, which explains a lot of the complaints here
- Being blunt about it, if you are new to this the answer is usually to keep your expectations low for the first fortnight rather than test two platforms at once
- While people disagree here, the step that matters most is to test two platforms at once: otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day
Despite the fact that people disagree here, the step that matters most is to give it a full week before judging: it stops you blaming the app for the profile. Worth saying that the decision to keep the first message short and specific did hardly at all more for me than switching platform, so results vary more than you'd think.
When you want something casual, the regional platforms tend to feel quite a lot worse than they are, so results vary more than you'd think.
For what it's worth, datewander.site works noticeably better for video-first chat, so it is worth a look.