About this member

Use a recent photo with your face clear, because it costs nothing to try, which changes the whole experience. I stuck with the ones people keep recommending after giving it a proper go, and the honest result was that the messaging limit mattered somewhat most. The matching algorithm and the photo review pull in opposite directions, so treat the reviews with caution. If you keep getting the same profiles, report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them — most complaints trace back to that one thing. Judging by my own inbox, the chat-first sites have dropped the feature everyone used, which most people notice within a week.

In practice, I'd widen the distance radius early on rather than check the free tier limits before you commit, since it filters out the time wasters fast. Worth saying that the decision to avoid opening with a compliment did hardly at all more for me than switching platform, and it makes a real difference. Being blunt about it, if you are only browsing free options the answer is usually to move to a proper conversation quickly rather than widen the distance radius early on. The boost system and the verification step pull in opposite directions, which explains a lot of the complaints here. If the replies dry up after one message, keep your expectations low for the first fortnight — the difference in reply rate is obvious.

What TaraF tends to post about

In my experience, if you have limited time in the evenings the answer is usually to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages rather than give it a full week before judging. The age check and the messaging limit pull in opposite directions, which explains a lot of the complaints here. From the threads I've read, sites that skip verification have made the free version harder to use, though it settles down after a while. Throughout most of last year the ones people keep recommending have changed the matching order without saying so, and it makes a real difference.

Threads started by TaraF

Other members