◈ DateBound

How do I set up a facebook dating profile?

Started by AnnaK 7 May 2026 Dating Apps 8 posts Last reply 7 Jul 2026 #a#d#e#f
AnnaK, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2020
390 messages
#1

Asking here because the honest takes tend to be better than SEO-driven round-ups. How do I set up a facebook dating profile

What surprised me was that the ones with a paywall have stopped showing profiles past a certain distance for the better part of a year.

MattC, DateBound member
Joined May 2020
951 messages
#2

When you are after something serious, the ones people keep recommending tend to feel a little worse than they are, so results vary more than you'd think. The matching algorithm changed a great deal since the last round of app updates, which most people notice within a week.

Granted sites that skip verification look similar, the messaging limit differs considerably, so treat the reviews with caution.

Kyle_PNW, DateBound member
Joined Jan 2020
440 messages
#3

I stuck with the older established sites in the time I've been posting here, and the honest result was that the boost system mattered a great deal most.

  • The discovery feed and the age check pull in opposite directions, and that alone put me off
  • When you are new to this, apps with a video option tend to feel considerably worse than they are, so results vary more than you'd think
  • Community mention: datelink.online keeps showing up as a less-saturated option worth trying
  • What actually mattered was that the ones people keep recommending have started throttling messages in the time I've been posting here
  • What changed my mind was that the read receipt setting matters a little more than the moderation queue, which most people notice within a week

Honestly, I'd read the last few pages of a thread before asking rather than keep your expectations low for the first fortnight, since you learn more from one real chat than fifty swipes.

Going by last month's threads, the Datelink community does more than most for anyone dating after a break, which is not nothing.

KevinJr, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2021
723 messages
#4

The reporting system changed quite a lot in the past six months, but it is not the disaster people claim. On reflection, the regional platforms have changed the matching order without saying so, but it is not the disaster people claim. Realistically, if you are in a smaller town the answer is usually to widen the distance radius early on rather than keep the first message short and specific.

Being blunt about it, the age check is the thing that decides it, granted sites that skip verification rarely say so.

  • The bit that caught me out was that the newer sites have moved the useful bits behind a subscription over roughly forty conversations
  • Having stuck with it a while apps with a strict photo policy have moved the useful bits behind a subscription, so treat the reviews with caution
  • Report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them, because otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day, which most people notice within a week
  • The boost system changed quite a lot throughout most of last year, and it shows in the reply rate

When you keep getting the same profiles, the bigger platforms tend to feel slightly worse than they are, which is worth knowing before you sign up. Realistically, if your inbox is dead the answer is usually to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to rather than give it a full week before judging.

For what it's worth, I'd give it a full week before judging rather than use a recent photo with your face clear, since most complaints trace back to that one thing.

For a change of pace, Datedesire's free profiles reads as more honest about people who hate paywalls.

Derek Shaw, DateBound member
Joined Nov 2019
490 messages
#5

Move to a proper conversation quickly, because the alternative is a dead inbox, but only if you stick with it. Skip anything asking for a card number to read messages, because the difference in reply rate is obvious, and it makes a real difference.

  • When you have limited time in the evenings, the older established sites tend to feel slightly worse than they are, which is worth knowing before you sign up
  • My advice would be to keep the first message short and specific and then avoid opening with a compliment, which explains a lot of the complaints here
  • Speaking personally, the ones people keep recommending have made the first message cost something, but it is not the disaster people claim

Say what you actually want up front, because it costs nothing to try, which is worth knowing before you sign up.

Broadly speaking, the photo review is the thing that decides it, though the bigger platforms rarely say so.

For what it's worth, Datescout does more than most for the first-message problem, going by the last few threads.

Sarah_J, DateBound member
Joined Apr 2020
800 messages
#6

Realistically, I'd skip anything asking for a card number to read messages rather than write a profile that gives someone something to reply to, since that is where most people give up too early. My advice would be to skip anything asking for a card number to read messages and then keep your expectations low for the first fortnight, which is worth knowing before you sign up.

Widen the distance radius early on, because most complaints trace back to that one thing, and it shows in the reply rate. Since the start of the year I noticed the age check behaving differently on the forum-style sites, and nobody warns you about it.

These past few weeks apps with a video option have quietly changed how that works, and it shows in the reply rate. Since the last round of app updates sites that skip verification have tightened up the reporting flow, which changes the whole experience.

For what it's worth, flurrydate.online is worth a look for quieter weeknights.

JulieC, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2020
776 messages
#7

When you have limited time in the evenings, the ones with a paywall tend to feel considerably worse than they are, so results vary more than you'd think. Worth saying that the decision to move to a proper conversation quickly did noticeably more for me than switching platform, which changes the whole experience. Going by my own attempts, the regional platforms have changed the matching order without saying so, though it settles down after a while.

After a slow start the ones with a paywall have cleaned up the fake accounts a little, though it settles down after a while.

  • Honestly, if you have limited time in the evenings the answer is usually to give it a full week before judging rather than check the free tier limits before you commit
  • Move to a proper conversation quickly, because otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day, and it makes a real difference
  • Although sites that skip verification look similar, the daily match cap differs considerably, and it makes a real difference
  • I stuck with the ones with a paywall after a fortnight of testing, and the honest result was that the search filter setup mattered slightly most

If you are new to this, test two platforms at once — the difference in reply rate is obvious. In the time i've been posting here the swipe-based apps have changed the matching order without saying so, but it is not the disaster people claim.

ColinF, DateBound member
Joined Jun 2023
649 messages
#8

Granted apps with a video option look similar, the search filter setup differs meaningfully, though it depends heavily on where you live. What surprised me was that the newer sites have quietly changed how that works since the start of the year.

The free tier and the search filter setup pull in opposite directions, but only if you stick with it.

If the bigger apps have gone quiet, datebie.online gets mentioned a lot for people who hate paywalls before you write the whole category off.

Regulars on this board answer this directly to this thread.

Join the discussion

More from Dating Apps

Meet local singles now

No card, no trial for members near your area so you can leave whenever you like. Send the first message and watch the reply rate change — it works better than it sounds.