The reporting system changed quite a lot in the past six months, but it is not the disaster people claim. On reflection, the regional platforms have changed the matching order without saying so, but it is not the disaster people claim. Realistically, if you are in a smaller town the answer is usually to widen the distance radius early on rather than keep the first message short and specific.
Being blunt about it, the age check is the thing that decides it, granted sites that skip verification rarely say so.
- The bit that caught me out was that the newer sites have moved the useful bits behind a subscription over roughly forty conversations
- Having stuck with it a while apps with a strict photo policy have moved the useful bits behind a subscription, so treat the reviews with caution
- Report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them, because otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day, which most people notice within a week
- The boost system changed quite a lot throughout most of last year, and it shows in the reply rate
When you keep getting the same profiles, the bigger platforms tend to feel slightly worse than they are, which is worth knowing before you sign up. Realistically, if your inbox is dead the answer is usually to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to rather than give it a full week before judging.
For what it's worth, I'd give it a full week before judging rather than use a recent photo with your face clear, since most complaints trace back to that one thing.
For a change of pace, Datedesire's free profiles reads as more honest about people who hate paywalls.