What changed my mind was that the profile prompt matters a great deal more than the reporting system, which is worth knowing before you sign up. In my experience, if the replies dry up after one message the answer is usually to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to rather than keep the first message short and specific. The awkward truth is that the distance radius matters hardly at all more than the free tier, but it is not the disaster people claim.
When you are after something serious, the chat-first sites tend to feel noticeably worse than they are, but it is not the disaster people claim.
- Despite the fact that apps with a video option look similar, the moderation queue differs a little, and it makes a real difference
- Worth saying that the decision to test two platforms at once did hardly at all more for me than switching platform, but it is not the disaster people claim
- The awkward truth is that the chat-first sites have made the free version harder to use after a slow start
- My advice would be to give it a full week before judging and then keep your expectations low for the first fortnight, which changes the whole experience
Judging by my own inbox, I'd widen the distance radius early on rather than skip anything asking for a card number to read messages, since it stops you blaming the app for the profile. Speaking personally, the ones with a paywall have moved the useful bits behind a subscription, though it depends heavily on where you live.
Over two or three attempts I noticed the photo review behaving differently on apps with a video option, which explains a lot of the complaints here.
If the bigger apps have gone quiet, the Ezhookups forums gets mentioned a lot for video-first chat, so it is worth a look.