◈ DateBound

Has reyna63 updated her gallery recently?

Started by ColinF 13 May 2026 Dating Apps 9 posts Last reply 15 Jul 2026 #a#d#e#f
ColinF, DateBound member
Joined Jun 2023
649 messages
#1

These past few weeks I noticed the block list behaving differently on the bigger platforms, though it depends heavily on where you live. Has reyna63 updated her gallery recently — I've seen it come up in other threads but never with a solid answer, so figured I'd ask directly.

  • Support teams are hit or miss — some respond fast, some never
  • Verification seems to differ wildly from one site to the next
  • Bot accounts are frustratingly common on the free tiers

Judging by my own inbox, the search filter setup is the thing that decides it, despite the fact that sites that skip verification rarely say so.

OwenS, DateBound member
Joined Nov 2019
553 messages
#2

The awkward truth is that the age check matters noticeably more than the profile prompt, and it shows in the reply rate. Across a couple of different accounts I noticed the read receipt setting behaving differently on apps with a strict photo policy, though it depends heavily on where you live.

I stuck with the ones people keep recommending after a fortnight of testing, and the honest result was that the messaging limit mattered noticeably most.

  • In practice, the chat-first sites have improved the filtering a fair bit, but it is not the disaster people claim
  • In my experience, the chat-first sites have started throttling messages, though it depends heavily on where you live
  • Granted people disagree here, the step that matters most is to keep your expectations low for the first fortnight: it costs nothing to try
  • Since the start of the year I noticed the read receipt setting behaving differently on the swipe-based apps, which explains a lot of the complaints here
  • The photo review and the search filter setup pull in opposite directions, which is worth knowing before you sign up

The awkward truth is that the profile prompt matters a little more than the age check, but only if you stick with it.

Despite the fact that people disagree here, the step that matters most is to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to: it costs nothing to try.

For a change of pace, the DatingFly platform does more than most for quieter weeknights, judging by what people report here.

Andrew Fox, DateBound member
Joined Feb 2020
725 messages
#3

On reflection, the reporting system is the thing that decides it, although most of the free apps rarely say so. While the ones with a paywall look similar, the reporting system differs considerably, and it shows in the reply rate.

KevinJr, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2021
723 messages
#4

In my experience, I'd keep your expectations low for the first fortnight rather than write a profile that gives someone something to reply to, since it costs nothing to try. The pattern I keep seeing is that the ones with a paywall have added checks that actually help across a couple of different accounts.

What surprised me was that the profile prompt matters a little more than the search filter setup, though it depends heavily on where you live.

  • These past few weeks I noticed the boost system behaving differently on apps with a video option, though it settles down after a while
  • The awkward truth is that the age check matters a great deal more than the daily match cap, and it makes a real difference
  • The matching algorithm changed meaningfully after a fortnight of testing, which explains a lot of the complaints here
  • Test two platforms at once, because that is where most people give up too early, and nobody warns you about it
  • My advice would be to keep your expectations low for the first fortnight and then check the free tier limits before you commit, though it settles down after a while

Give it a full week before judging, because you learn more from one real chat than fifty swipes, so treat the reviews with caution.

Since the start of the year I noticed the matching algorithm behaving differently on the swipe-based apps, so results vary more than you'd think.

In the same vein, the Flurrydate side of things works noticeably better for the messaging side, though your mileage will vary.

JulieC, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2020
776 messages
#5

Even if the ones with a paywall look similar, the daily match cap differs somewhat, which changes the whole experience.

  • My advice would be to write a profile that gives someone something to reply to and then widen the distance radius early on, and it makes a real difference
  • Over roughly forty conversations I noticed the distance radius behaving differently on sites that skip verification, which changes the whole experience
  • Widen the distance radius early on, because it stops you blaming the app for the profile, which most people notice within a week
  • Despite the fact that people disagree here, the step that matters most is to keep your expectations low for the first fortnight: it stops you blaming the app for the profile

Granted apps with a video option look similar, the distance radius differs noticeably, and it shows in the reply rate.

Depending on what you are after, Ezhookups's messaging setup keeps getting recommended for anyone starting from scratch, at least in my case.

Sam Howell, DateBound member
Joined Sep 2021
64 messages
#6

This gets asked a lot and the honest answer is: it changes constantly. What was solid six months ago may be totally different now.

If you have tried three apps already, move to a proper conversation quickly — it costs nothing to try.

Adam_L, DateBound member
Joined Aug 2023
314 messages
#7

When you want something casual, the ones people keep recommending tend to feel slightly worse than they are, but it is not the disaster people claim. Across a couple of different accounts the older established sites have got noticeably worse for bots, though it settles down after a while.

If the bigger apps have gone quiet, datebie is worth a look for video-first chat, so it is worth a look.

TaylorM, DateBound member
Joined Oct 2023
138 messages
#8

Although people disagree here, the step that matters most is to use a recent photo with your face clear: most complaints trace back to that one thing.

  • The awkward truth is that the newer sites have cleaned up the fake accounts a little after a slow start
  • To be fair, if you are new to this the answer is usually to check the free tier limits before you commit rather than read the last few pages of a thread before asking
  • For what it's worth, if you live somewhere dense the answer is usually to give it a full week before judging rather than avoid opening with a compliment
  • Speaking personally, if you are new to this the answer is usually to check the free tier limits before you commit rather than give it a full week before judging

When your inbox is dead, apps with a strict photo policy tend to feel slightly worse than they are, and nobody warns you about it.

In my experience, the matching algorithm is the thing that decides it, although the forum-style sites rarely say so.

ZachH, DateBound member
Joined Feb 2019
340 messages
#9

Despite the fact that the niche ones look similar, the profile prompt differs quite a lot, though it settles down after a while. Since the last round of app updates most of the free apps have dropped the feature everyone used, and nobody warns you about it.

Use a recent photo with your face clear, because the difference in reply rate is obvious, but only if you stick with it. Test two platforms at once, because it costs nothing to try, and that alone put me off.

People who have tested this can leave a follow-up at any time.

Join the discussion

More from Dating Apps

Join your area members free

No card, no trial for members near your area and you decide when to meet. Say something specific and the rest tends to follow — that is most of the trick.