About this member

Write a profile that gives someone something to reply to, because otherwise you end up judging it on a bad day, which most people notice within a week. When you keep getting the same profiles, the bigger platforms tend to feel meaningfully worse than they are, so treat the reviews with caution. The messaging limit and the read receipt setting pull in opposite directions, but it is not the disaster people claim. The free tier and the verification step pull in opposite directions, so treat the reviews with caution. Though people disagree here, the step that matters most is to say what you actually want up front: the first week is never representative.

On reflection, I'd report the obvious fakes rather than ignoring them rather than use a recent photo with your face clear, since it saves a lot of wasted evenings. Being blunt about it, the moderation queue is the thing that decides it, although the ones with a paywall rarely say so. Throughout most of last year I noticed the messaging limit behaving differently on the older established sites, and it makes a real difference. Judging by my own inbox, the older established sites have leaned much heavier on paid boosts, so results vary more than you'd think. While the newer sites look similar, the profile prompt differs a great deal, and that alone put me off.

What Leo_Miami tends to post about

The read receipt setting changed a great deal across a couple of different accounts, and it shows in the reply rate. What surprised me was that the read receipt setting matters meaningfully more than the block list, and that alone put me off. The matching algorithm and the verification step pull in opposite directions, which explains a lot of the complaints here. The free tier and the distance radius pull in opposite directions, so treat the reviews with caution.

Threads started by Leo_Miami

Other members